Reviews
Lost In La Mancha
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
| Directed by: | Keith Fulton, Louis Pepe |
| Written by: | Keith Fulton, Louis Pepe |
| Starring: | Terry Gilliam, Johnny Depp, Jean Rochefort, Jeff Bridges |
| Released: | October 16, 2003 |
| Grade: | A- |
Three years ago, director Terry Gilliam was set to make a film called The Man Who Killed Don Quixote. If you’re not familiar with Gilliam, his previous credits include Time Bandits, The Fisher King, Twelve Monkeys and Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas. Gilliam struggled to get funding for his new in the United States and had to turn to Europe for support. He could only muster $32m (not nearly enough) but he decided to proceed with production anyway and hope things went perfectly.
History tells us that the exact opposite happened. Due to conflicting schedules, most of his cast couldn’t find the time to arrive early for valuable rehearsals. This included Johnny Depp, fresh off the success of Chocolat, and French actor Jean Rochefort (The Man On The Train) who had spent his last seven months learning English so he could tackle the leading role.
Gilliam continued on but once principal shooting began, things only got worse. A savage storm on day two left the set in disarray. On day five, Rochefort developed a prostate infection and had to return to France for treatment. He would never return and the film was never completed. It was officially “abandoned”.
Lost In La Mancha is a very insightful look at just how difficult it is to make a motion picture. Throughout the production, Keith Fulton and Louis Pepe shot a lot of “behind the scenes” footage which they initially thought would make a great adage to the dvd. Instead, their footage has wound up on the big screen in this compelling documentary.
Terry Gilliam remains an optimist throughout it all but from the very start of the shoot, you can see the rumblings from his crew who sense trouble is brewing. I give credit to all those involved with the initial movie in allowing their thoughts and ideas to be publicly expressed here. It would be so easy to hide all this material and seeing it, in all its realism, makes it one of the year’s most refreshingly honest releases.
Jeff Bridges, who worked with Gilliam in The Fisher King, narrates the film. The pictures though do all the talking and despite the unfortunate mess and loss of money that resulted from it all, you can’t help but chuckle at the bad luck that befalls them. Big names directors Woody Allen and Robert Altman express their support for the film on the poster which serves as a huge endorsement. They’re not wrong. It’s destined to be a cult classic and one enjoyed by filmmakers for years to come.
Kill Bill: Volume One
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
| Directed by: | Quentin Tarantino |
| Written by: | Quentin Tarantino |
| Starring: | Uma Thurman, Lucy Liu, Vivica A. Fox, Daryl Hannah, David Carradine |
| Released: | October 16, 2003 |
| Grade: | B+ |
The opening credits will tell you that this “feature presentation” is the “fourth film by Quentin Tarantino.” It’s been six years since his last film, Jackie Brown, and almost a decade since he changed modern day filmmaking with cult favourites Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction. On the set of Fiction, Tarantino and star Uma Thurman talked about creating a modern day martial arts film and here we have it with… Kill Bill.
Unlike his previous works, there isn’t an intricately complicated story unfolding. A five member posse known as the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad viciously kill an entire wedding party during a small ceremony at an isolated church. Or so they thought. The bride (Thurman) survived and spent four years in a coma as a result of shocking gunshot wounds. We know this woman only as her code name, Black Mamba. Her real name is spoken on two occasions but it is bleeped out to prevent us hearing it.
Awaking from the coma, Black Mamba only wants one thing – revenge. On a piece of paper, she writes the five names of the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad members and begins her quest. In Volume One, she will kill Vernita Green (Fox) and O-Ren Ishii (Liu). In Volume Two, to be released early next year, I assume she will go after Budd (Madsen), Elle Driver (Hannah) and Bill (Carradine). I feel somewhat cheated in that I will have to pay twice to see all of it. The film should have been released as one three-hour movie but the powers that be thought better of it.
I’m not a big martial arts fan and perhaps this contributed to my reluctance to accepting this film. There are some well choreographed battles and swordfights but nothing truly original or outstanding. I’ve seen this many times before and there is a strong similarity with The Matrix: Reloaded. Evidently different though is the amount of violence. This is the most sadistic release of the 2003 year and the film has been censored accordingly in Australia. Whilst nothing was cut, some scenes are shown in black and white as the sight of red blood was “deemed” too confronting. Sigh.
Why you do need to see this movie is because it’s a Quentin Tarantino picture. It oozes with class and style. He has a warped sense of humour and I had to chuckle at the couple of Star Trek jokes he somehow wove into the screenplay. He has also mastered the art of finding the perfect movie soundtrack. Like he did in Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown, there are extended sequences where a pumping music track is played against no dialogue.
Disappointment is my reaction to Kill Bill: Volume One in that I have the highest expectations from Tarantino and in this case, he didn’t fully deliver. Then again, I’ve only seen half of the movie so perhaps I’ll change my appraisal once I return from the four month intermission.
Matchstick Men
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
| Directed by: | Ridley Scott |
| Written by: | Nicholas Griffin, Ted Griffin |
| Starring: | Nicolas Cage, Sam Rockwell, Alison Lohman, Bruce McGill, Bruce Altman |
| Released: | October 2, 2003 |
| Grade: | A- |
Directors who specialise in a certain genre must be very tempted to branch out and tackle material they wouldn’t be expected to. They need new challenges and want to show the film world how deep their talent is. Steven Spielberg for example made last year’s comedy Catch Me If You Can fresh off the intricate sci-fi drama Minority Report.
The director of Matchstick Men is Ridley Scott, a talented craftsman who was all but forgotten three years ago. He made Alien and Blade Runner early in his career and in 1991 earned his first Oscar nomination for Thelma & Louise. Scott’s next two films, White Squall and G.I. Jane, floundered but like a true Hollywood underdog, he bounced back with Gladiator and Black Hawk Down. Both films saw him covered once again with acclaim and two more Oscar nominations were in order.
If you look closely at all the abovementioned films, you can see Scott is a man who loves action blockbusters of epic proportions. Until now, he had never directed a comedy but having seen Matchstick Men, he’s comfortably adjusted his style to pass the test.
It’s a quirky film with a smart screenplay from brothers Ted and Nicholas Griffin. It’s about two con-men – Roy (Cage) and Frank (Rockwell) who swindle suckers out of their hard earned money. They’ve been partners for years and Roy has put together quite a nest egg. Roy’s troubles are not financial – he’s got quite a few phobias that are severely limiting his enjoyment of life. He’s scared to be outdoors, his house has to be impeccably clean at all times, he’s seeing a shrink, and he’s on medication to help with these psychotic problems.
At a strip club (hilariously known as the Spearmint Rhino), Frank meets the wealthy Chuck Frechette (McGill) who he’s lined up as the next target. Roy however, has even more dramas in store when he discovers he has a 14-year-old daughter, Angela (Lohman) who comes to stay with him. She’s a troubled girl, he’s a troubled guy and together they seem to find just what each other needs. The isn’t much room for relationships though in the life of a con-artist and Roy’s going to have to make some tough decisions…
Don’t be fooled into thinking this is a predictable, melodramatic sob story. The actors deliver precision performances in that you suspect, but are never quite sure, who is pulling all the strings. You’ll watch with keen interest waiting to see if your hunches are proven true. The three leading cast members strongly add to their already impressive year. Cage is following Adaptation, Rockwell is following Confessions Of A Dangerous Mind and Lohman is following White Oleander. When you’ve two well received movies in the one year, you know you’re on a roll.
Matchstick Men isn’t being promoted with the same force as Gladiator and Black Hawk Down so make sure you don’t overlook it when heading to the cinema. There ain’t much else on at the moment (in terms of both quantity and quality) so this should temporarily fill the void.
Calendar Girls
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
| Directed by: | Nigel Cole |
| Written by: | Tim Firth, Juliette Towhidi |
| Starring: | Helen Mirren, Julie Walters, Ciaran Hinds, Philip Glenister, Linda Bassett, Penelope Wilton |
| Released: | October 9, 2003 |
| Grade: | B+ |
During the first half of Calendar Girls I made a mental note that I must describe this as a “hidden, feel-good gem”. We’re looking at a group of experienced actresses having fun delivering lines from a script inspired by a remarkable true story. The audience was in hysterics and I too found myself laughing at some of the comical scenes.
It’s the story of best friends Annie (Walters) and Chris (Mirren) who have to go through the tragedy of seeing Annie’s husband lose a short battle with cancer. It’s the worst moment in Annie’s life but she wants to create something positive from the situation. The couch in the waiting room of the hospital is dreadful and she’d like to raise a thousand pounds to pay for a new couch to make those anxious moments a little more comfortable for anyone else who comes through.
The local women’s group, known as the Rylstone Women’s Institute, always makes an annual calendar with pictures of scenic views and other standard photos. Chris uses this concept but with a twist – she wants to make a calendar only this one will feature photos of the elderly ladies from the group in all their naked glory.
Yes, this is a true story and if the calendar were a dreadful failure, I wouldn’t be here typing a review right now. What Annie and Chris created was a calendar that would sell all over the globe and in over $1,000,000 has been raised to date. Not only did this money pay for the couch but it paid for a new leukaemia wing at the hospital and it changed all these ladies’ lives forever.
It’s a delightful story but the film loses its way in the final half which is an unfortunate shame. Despite her successes with the calendar, Chris has troubles at home with a husband who misses her and a son who needs her. This aspect is looked at but not explored. It’s glazed over to the detriment of these characters and you start to realise this whole production has been well and truly glossed up to make it more appealing. There’s a passage in the film in America where the girls all appear on the Tonight Show With Jay Leno (who does make a cameo) – it adds zero to the story and halts any emotion and momentum.
Academy award nominated actors Helen Mirren and Julie Walters light up the screen and do shine in these roles. I haven’t seen the real calendar but I don’t think the ladies that posed would have looked quite as good as these two. 95% of the audience at my screening were women and they simply loved Annie and Chris. A bad word was not spoken by anyone leaving the cinema and it will brighten the day of any patron.
Gettin' Square
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
| Directed by: | Jonathan Teplitzky |
| Written by: | Chris Nyst |
| Starring: | Sam Worthington, David Wenham, Timothy Spall, Gary Sweet, Freya Stafford, David Field, Luke Pegler |
| Released: | October 9, 2003 |
| Grade: | A- |
Shot over a nine week period at the end of last year, Gettin’ Square was deservedly selected to open this year’s Brisbane International Film Festival. It’s a stylish look at drugs, crime and corruption on our very own Gold Coast. Of the 20 films in contention for this year’s Australian Film Institute Awards, it’s the only one we Queenslanders can call our own and on seeing it, we should be proud of what we offer.
Barry Wirth (Worthington) has served nine of a twelve year sentence for manslaughter. He was found guilty of killing a security guard during a burglary but he has always proclaimed his innocence and blamed the set-up on Police Detective Arnie DeViers (Field). He was initially denied parole but on his mother’s death has changed matters. His younger brother Joey (Pegler) needs parental guidance and Barry has been released under the condition he acts as guardian.
Barry has trouble getting a job on the outside but a friend who puts in a good word with restaurant owner Darren Barrington (Spall) who owns a struggling restaurant known as the Texas Rose. Darren’s lawyer advises him to scrap the restaurant and reap the gains from the property market. The plan is to buy the land for $600,000, bribe the Mayor to have it rezoned, then sell it to a property developer at a huge profit. All he need do is put a $200,000 deposit down and it’s his.
Darren has that amount sitting with his accountant who’s been helping him with some light money laundering activities. Unfortunately, the wife of the accountant caught her husband screwing around and dobbed in him to the Criminal Investigation Commission (CIC). Now, Darren’s got nothing and may spend time in jail if implicated in the scam. Barry’s going to help Darren out with the assistance of drugged up friend Johnny Spitieri (Wenham) and also look to square the ledger against the corrupt Arnie DeViers.
The writer of the film’s screenplay is Chris Nyst, a high profile lawyer on the Gold Coast. I am sure he has drawn on many of his own experiences in crafting this intelligent screenplay. After attending the premiere in Sydney a few weeks ago, Chris has to fly straight back to help defend one of his big-name clients, Pauline Hanson. The director is Jonathan Teplitzky who has made this his second feature following Better Than Sex, a wonderful comedy which was released back in 2001.
Gettin’ Square offers a well rounded cast with the rugged Sam Worthington (Dirty Deeds, Bootmen) giving his very best. For me personally, the highlight of the film was watching English actor Timothy Spall play Darren, the restaurant owner. I first saw Spall in the Oscar nominated Secrets & Lies and have followed his career since with roles in Still Crazy, Topsy-Turvy and All Or Nothing. It’s a tough job luring top overseas talent to star in local Aussie productions and credit to Spall for picking a good script and taking the chance.
Brisbane and Gold Coast locals will recognise many of the film’s shooting locations and it’s a great postcard to be sending the rest of the world. No word yet on whether the film will receive an international release but so far the signs are good. Despite the high quality this year’s Australian releases, few have performed well at the box-office. Don’t let the same fate befall Gettin’ Square. You’ll love it so see it as fast as you can!
Swimming Pool
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
| Directed by: | Francois Ozon |
| Written by: | Francois Ozon |
| Starring: | Charlotte Rampling, Ludivine Sagnier, Charles Dance, Marc Fayolle, Jean-Marie Lamour |
| Released: | October 2, 2003 |
| Grade: | B+ |
More and more non-American films are appearing in Australian cinemas and it’s great to see. We no longer have to wait until the yearly film festivals to appreciate what other countries have to offer. Francois Ozon is a leading director in France and his prowess saw Swimming Pool appear as one of the few French entrants selected to compete for the Palm D’or at this year’s lucrative Cannes Film Festival.
It’s a story which begins a little too slowly. Sarah Morton is a wealthy writer suffering from a case of writers block. She has always written detective murder mysteries but wants to do something different to answer her critics. Helping her out is editor John Bosload (Dance) who offers his French villa to Sarah as a place to go, clear her mind, and write in peace.
It’s everything that Sarah was looking for an almost immediately she’s put pen to paper. The relaxing atmosphere is soon to be upset when John’s teenage daughter, Julie (Sagnier) arrives to stay. Sarah is furious with John for omitting to tell her this before she came. Julie is a sexually promiscuous girl who brings home a new man every night. She’s got no qualms with her body either and frequently swims in the pool and walks around the house topless. Ozon makes sure we don’t miss this either with frequent extended close ups on Sagnier’s large breasts.
Sarah and Julie are at odds but soon become friends with Sarah drawing on Julie’s personality and stories as inspiration for her new book. She starts fumbling through Julie’s diary, spying on her around the house and asking quizzical questions about her past and relationship with her father. It’s the kind of story you’d expect Sarah to be writing about rather than actually experiencing which makes it all the more ironic.
My mind tended to waver at stages as some scenes were completely useless and offered nothing to the story. One for example, sees Sarah plug in her computer using a double adaptor. Why it was included I do not know. Any doubts regarding the screenplay and some of the interesting developments will be answered by a very appropriate conclusion which I strongly approve of but will not spoil.
It may be a French production but most every word is in English and so the beauty of the location (and its star) will not be lost in the chore of reading subtitles. You should never judge a book by its cover and if you have any doubts while watching the film, remember to wait till it’s fully over before reaching a definitive conclusion.